A tremendous amount of analysis on Kelo vs New London has already been done and I have nothing substantive to add (check out just about any site in my blog roll); but if you haven't already, be sure to read this infuriating op-ed from the NYT (of course) on the Kelo decision, The Limits of Property Rights. The title says it all, huh? But just to give you a taste:
The Supreme Court's ruling yesterday that the economically troubled city of New London, Conn., can use its power of eminent domain to spur development was a welcome vindication of cities' ability to act in the public interest. It also is a setback to the "property rights" movement, which is trying to block government from imposing reasonable zoning and environmental regulations.
It's enough to make you want to cry. Read the whole thing for a clear picture of what we're up against.
A Possible Course of Action: I'm sure plenty have already done so, but consider contacting your state representative regarding the Court's decision. Ask what safeguards your state has in place to protect private property. Ask what criteria your state must meet in order to invoke eminent domain. Ask if there are any plans to address the issue at the next legislative session. Some states are already considering acting to preserve property and make invocation of eminent domain an arduous process. Start putting the pressure on now. I wrote my state representative on the matter and heard back in less than 24 hours.
You forgot to mention that the NYT itself benefited from a private-for-private taking when it built it new HQ in Manhattan. I believe 14 properties were seized.
Fair and balanced... ;-)
Posted by: KipEsquire | June 28, 2005 at 07:28 AM