Vis a vis this post, an astute JG reader comments:
We're setting the bar pretty low if we have to point out that other countries have worse gulags than us. The whole American creed was that we were an alternative to that sort of thing, not a lesser version of it.
I agree. But there have been past instances where the US has denied people habeas corpus -- for purely pragmatic reasons and for limited periods -- as we cope with existential threats to our freedom. And our freedoms have survived each those periods. That said, I agree that we should do more to provide some sort of process (but not necessarily "due process") for the prisoners at Gitmo.
My gripe is with how organizations like Amnesty International have seized on this for its anti-American propaganda value. To call Gimto a gulag -- let alone "the gulag of our times" -- is worse than moral equivalency. And in my opinion, the left is simply in no position to lecture us on this subject, considering, for example, how comfortable they are with the state of due process on the rest of the Cuban island.